Published: • 3 min read

Does First-Pitch Strike Rate Actually Predict Pitcher Performance?

Table of Contents

I posted a while back about how wOBA changes throughout an at bat in wOBA by Count. So I thought an interesting follow-up is whether pitchers who throw first-pitch strikes more often end up with better results the following season.

The Data

I pulled F-Strike% for pitchers who faced at least 100 batters in both 2024 and 2025, which left 329 pitchers. The predictor is their 2024 F-Strike%. The outcomes are their 2025 FIP and 2025 wOBA allowed.

FIP focuses on strikeouts, walks, and home runs (the outcomes pitchers control most directly, independent of defense). wOBA allowed includes everything: contact results, batted ball outcomes, the works. I ran scatter plots in R with F-Strike% on the x-axis and a linear regression line on each. I’m still learning R, so take the presentation for what it is.

Results

Scatter plot titled “Does First-Pitch Strike Rate Predict FIP?” with 2024 F-Strike% from 40 to 60 percent on the x-axis and 2025 FIP from about 2 to 8 on the y-axis. The 329 points form a wide, diffuse cloud, and the regression line slopes gently downward from roughly 4.6 to 3.5 FIP across the range.

2024 F-Strike% vs. 2025 FIP: R² = 0.032.

Scatter plot titled “Does First-Pitch Strike Rate Predict wOBA Allowed?” with 2024 F-Strike% from 40 to 60 percent on the x-axis and 2025 wOBA allowed from about 0.19 to 0.47 on the y-axis. The same 329 points scatter broadly, and the regression line declines only slightly from about 0.335 to 0.307.

2024 F-Strike% vs. 2025 wOBA allowed: R² = 0.014.

Is it predictive?

The direction is right in both cases. Pitchers with higher F-Strike% in 2024 tended to post slightly better numbers in 2025, but neither relationship is strong. 3.2% and 1.4% of explained variance leaves a lot of room for other factors.

Whether that means F-Strike% is genuinely not that predictive, or whether a single season of data is just noisy at the pitcher level, is hard to say from this alone. F-Strike% itself may not be especially stable year to year, which would also limit how well it can predict anything. That would be worth checking separately.

Based on these numbers, F-Strike% is probably not a useful forward-looking stat by itself. The direction makes intuitive sense to me, but R² values of 0.032 and 0.014 are low enough that you would not want to lean on it as a predictor.